🍒 EXPOSED: PokerStars Review for July - A Warning for Players

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🖐

Filter:
Sort:
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Is PokerStars a trusted and secure online poker site? Read our PokerStars review for detailed insight on the platform, app, and exclusive bonus.


Enjoy!
PokerStars Review – £ FREE Bonus!
Valid for casinos
PokerStars Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of 5d-cinema.ru
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Join the people who've already reviewed PokerStars. Your experience can Kalle Johannesson. 2 reviews. 1 star: Bad. Jun. 20,


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars is the most popular online poker room. Find out how I rate PokerStars in this critical and honest Poker Stars review for


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

🔥 1,254 • Bad

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Anyway, to me a mediocre poker experience, but no scam. May 6, by Azzuri on PokerStars Review. Scam. Same m.o. every time. I put money in and.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars has built quite a reputation for itself. Learn more about the platform by reading our review and claim your Welcome Bonus!


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Find out why PokerStars is the world's #1 poker site in our in-depth review. We've got an great bonus of $pound; FREE for our players!


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Find out why PokerStars is the world's #1 poker site in our in-depth review. We've got an great bonus of $pound; FREE for our players!


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Join the people who've already reviewed PokerStars. Your experience can Kalle Johannesson. 2 reviews. 1 star: Bad. Jun. 20,


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Is PokerStars legit? Safety and security. When choosing an online poker room, players want a place that is safe and secure. At PokerStars, only the latest.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

🔥

Software - MORE
CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

PokerStars has built quite a reputation for itself. Learn more about the platform by reading our review and claim your Welcome Bonus!


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars reviews 2020

I sure hope that the proper people do see this and take some kind of action, just to see for themselves Too bad that we don't know who is the real culprit behind the doors of this scamming site I won't be back PokerStars has significant problems with Customer Service and isn't doing the best job with this and deserves criticism. They aren't really "beating the odds" just experiencing standard statistical variation. We believe that all of these poor decisions stemmed from the fact that PokerStars decided to break US law by continuing to offer their services to Americans. The company lost a lot of money and a significant portion of its customer base. On May 1, , PokerStars sent an email to its online marketing partners drastically changing the terms of their agreements, causing significant damage to all of their Internet partners for their own benefit. There is just no way that you can lose so many pots to random cards like that. On April 15, , the Department of Justice seized the pokerstars. Therefore, PokerStars has motivation, and the company has chosen to ignore rather than dispute the video evidence. What this means is that marketing partners that have been supporting and promoting PokerStars for years and years will lose all revenues from those players. In addition, VIP rewards are earned based on the amount staked not the amount won or lost. Ditto with PKR. PokerStars are now active in the US btw. We feel this choice started PokerStars down a road of shadiness which leads us to our opinion today — that PokerStars is a scam. The revenues that PokerStars earns is based on the total pot no matter who wins it. I could be wrong, but it sure doesn't seem as it plays out that way. Associating with the owners — the Scheinbergs — prevented PokerStars from entering US markets, which eventually led to the sale of PokerStars to Amaya. PokerStars had a strong reputation ten years ago, but that all began to change in late when the U. I am a retired poker dealer of many years and I refuse to accept their opinion of how the cards are dealt with an algorythm that is supposedly random. The nature of online play, however, is that it is more difficult for a pro player to be consistently successful. Every poker site has lots of people complaining about bad beats as though the universe circles around them. They are far from perfect and need to raise their game with CS but scam? For some, this data was evidence that PokerStars was rigging standard games or at least that the dealer mechanism was not random. They will only get compensated for players from the past 2 years. This was true prior to the UIGEA, and it is true even now in the states where the brand has a legal presence. Amaya does not care about the players or the business partners of PokerStars. As someone who nearly lost a chunk of my bankroll when fulltilt went under, I was very glad that PokerStars paid me this when they bought the company. Department of Justice in This settlement allowed PokerStars to return to the U. PA, NJ and likely more states opening up soon as well. PokerStars is a scam. The company is located in the Isle of Man and acquired a European Union gambling license through Malta. PokerStars did react to this story by providing these studies with more comprehensive data sets to work with. PokerStars turns a profit on every real-money player no matter how much he or she wins. The most egregious act destroying any remaining goodwill PokerStars may have had came very recently. Absolutely terrible, no customer service, they wont even try to help with the smallest issue.. It doesn't - every player gets them - you aren't special. Although the company started as a play-money service only, the focus has been on real-money poker for more than a decade. PokerStars was guilty — and when online poker became legalized in New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware, with the potential of California coming next, some laws had a bad actor clause — which disallowed PokerStars from entering the market since they were illegally operating in the US previously. Ignore and do your own research. I do not believe the site is rigged in regards to cheating because it makes no sense as previously stated by others. Sorry, but we have to call it. I put money in and easily run it up to 3or 4 times my investment. If you win a big tournament, what prevents PokerStars from immediately changing their terms to not pay you out?! And that revenue share plan would persist for the life of the player. PokerStars did not fully satisfy these commitments even though they now own and are responsible for the Full Tilt brand. To this day, countless players and business partners are owed money from Full Tilt. Anyway, to me a mediocre poker experience, but no scam. For that reason, it is very difficult to believe that PokerStars would rig games on a regular basis, and there is no concrete proof to suggest that PokerStars has done so. They also deserve criticism for how they handled dismantling their SuperNova scheme. EVERY player "beats the odds" on multiple occasions. Prior to the seizure, PokerStars could not legally provide service to U. On April 20, the pokerstars. PS' RNG random number generator is independently verified so perhaps check your facts before making silly assertions like this. In fact, PokerStars purchased Full Tilt Poker and continues to manage and operate this brand — a brand that is synonymous with the term ponzi scheme. Nevertheless, there is incentive to be even more profitable in a highly competitive market, and PokerStars would not be the first online gambling service to increase profits by exploiting consumers. This act made it illegal for PokerStars to accept US players and illegal for US banks to process payments related to online poker. After watching my account depleted repeatedly, I started to document my play.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Full Tilt Poker had rampant cheating going — and this is a fact. Obviously not. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}Since , PokerStars has been among the most prominent online poker brands. In doing so, PokerStars breached the privacy contract with its players. If PokerStars is willing to do this to their business partners, then what are they willing to do to their players? Same m. On May 1, , PokerStars unilaterally changed the terms to only compensate their marketing partners for only two years. PokerStars has been in business for over 15 years. I do feel the "random card generator" algorithm is not what it should be and does not deliver cards with the percentages over the long hall of a dealer with a shuffle machine. However much of the above is fact-less garbage that ought to be ignored. I am amazed that they are operating at all, and have learned to do more research before helping a company profit. Create your own review. The most concerning question about PokerStars is whether the service is rigged. Admittedly, there is some compelling video evidence on YouTube of sponsored PokerStars players beating the odds on multiple occasions during a number of big events. Although user names were stripped, hand logs are publicly available, and it is possible to associate individual players with the released data. So out of date - often inaccurate, poorly researched article above. Another point of concern for poker players considering PokerStars is that the company has never received accreditation from the Better Business Bureau. You start to lose consistently. It is worth noting that there were at least two independent analyses of the PokerStars dealer mechanism that presented data outside the norm. Way too many bad beats regardless of which side of it you're on. Amaya added a 2. I love the believers who drank the cool aid , who try and spew the same crap. A much bigger concern of whether PokerStars games are rigged is whether the company is actually cheating players out of winnings. The company was one of the driving factors in the meteoric success of its young industry, and always offered strong security measures and customer support. There are a significant number of complaints on file, and we urge everyone to check with their local BBB to consider local experiences with the PokerStars brand. PokerStars spends a lot of money on its sponsorships, and it behooves the brand to have these professional players be successful. PokerStars does not want money leaving the system, so players that earn profits and routinely withdraw cash from the site are not good for the site. Amaya increased the rake at PokerStars in late ! Basically, this is a breach of contract and PokerStars is more than willing to completely screw their partners. There is no way in hell that the flops of 2 and 1 come up that many times in a real game and the bad beats This is a very disgusting site and the customer service I honestly believe that they have so called "BOTS" being fictional players, just to line their own pockets. Keep in mind that PokerStars has no incentive to rig poker games outside of sponsored play. And this new change of ownership has led to the issues we see today. Then it happens. The biggest online poker site in the world at the time, PartyPoker, immediately accepted and followed this new US law, and left the USA market. Marketing partners of PokerStars had an agreement — that they would receive a certain percentage of the revenues that PokerStars earned off players referred by that partner. A quick search online will reveal a sharp increase in the last several years of players making complaints about having their accounts seized, bankrolls reduced when making a withdrawal, withdrawals refused, bonuses voided for no reason and so forth. The BBB does track international companies, however, and although it has not accredited or rated PokerStars, it does have a file for the company in nearly every state.